Civil Rights Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 101 - 110 of 160
Gregory Gatewood v. Katie Graham
as 12-6528
Plaintiff - Appellant: GREGORY GATEWOOD
Defendant - Appellee: KATIE GRAHAM, Officer
Jones et al v. El Bey et al
as 2:2012cv03049
Plaintiff: C. Jones, Mullens, Bond and others
Defendant: Noble Atum Re Hotep El Bey and Antron Sprowels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv15151
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Graham v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2012cv14491
Plaintiff: Robert Earl Graham
Defendant: Detroit, City of, Ralph Godbee, John Doe and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01020
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv14150
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brandon Jones, et al v. Hamilton County Government, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-6079
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRANDON RAYMOND JONES and THOMAS JOSEPH COLEMAN, III
Defendant - Appellee: HAMILTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT, Tennessee, FRED R. SKILLERN, JAMES A. FIELDS and others
Litten v. Woodhaven, City of, et al
as 2:2012cv13695
Defendant: Woodhaven, City of , Woodhaven Police Chief Gordon Chretien , Woodhaven Police Lt. Harwood and others
Plaintiff: Brian Keith Litten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-3931
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Coleman et al v. Hamilton County Government et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00190
Plaintiff: Brandon Raymond Jones and Thomas Joseph Coleman, III
Defendant: Hamilton County Government , Fred R Skillern, James A Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?