Cases 11 - 20 of 409
Leschinski v. Canton, Township of et al
as 2:2024cv10012
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Leschinski
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF CANTON, OFFICER BRANDON HAYFORD, ALEXIS DIVETTA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff:
TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harrison v. Dayton Municipal Court of Ohio et al
as 3:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Todd Harrison
Defendant:
Dayton Municipal Court of Ohio, Christopher Roberts, Christoopher Sturm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cedric Carter v. Rivershell Apartments, LLC, et al
as 23-1885
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CEDRIC CARTER
Defendant / Appellee:
RIVERSHELL APARTMENTS, LLC, jointly and severally, CONNIE ROBERTS, jointly and severally, ANDMARK RIVERSHELL APARTMENTS, LLC, jointly and severally and others
Spann et al v. Carter et al
as 3:2023cv01028
Plaintiff:
William A. Spann and Marty Spann
Defendant:
Ed Carter, Mitchell Bailey, Dale Grandstaff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Warwick v. City of Detroit, et al
as 2:2023cv11779
Plaintiff:
Joanne Warwick
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Mike Duggan, Mary Sheffield and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
