Cases 11 - 20 of 3,232
Treasurer of Cuyahoga County, Ohio v. Barksdale
as 1:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Treasurer of Cuyahoga County, Ohio
Defendant:
Christopher Scott Barksdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chapman v. Yost
as 2:2024cv01865
Plaintiff:
Tasha Chapman
Defendant:
Ohio Attorney Genera Dave Yost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. City of Columbus, Ohio et al
as 2:2024cv01841
Plaintiff:
Estate of Donovan L. Lewis
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Ohio and Chief Elaine Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. City of Warren et al.
as 4:2024cv00681
Plaintiff:
Stephen W. Brown
Defendant:
City of Warren, Ohio and Trumbull County Land Reutilization Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Davis et al v. McGuffey et al
as 1:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Jason Davis and Jennifer Davis
Defendant:
Charmaine McGuffey, Jay Gramke and Hamilton County, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Community Church of Chesterland, Ohio et al. v. Penny et al.
as 1:2024cv00642
Plaintiff:
Community Church of Chesterland, Ohio, Jess Peacock, Megan Carver and others
Defendant:
Aimenn D. Penny, Chris Uthe, Brandon Perdue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
