Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Hall-Rayford et al v. Owens et al
as 2:2022cv12714
Plaintiff:
Mary Hall-Rayford, Karen Beltz, Karen Mouradjian and others
Defendant:
Monique Owens and Eastpointe, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv10256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Coffey v. Freeport, City of et al
as 2:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Ann Coffey
Defendant:
Freeport, City of, Bay View, City of, Munson Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Coffey v. Freeport, City of et al
as 2:2021cv00258
Plaintiff:
Ann Coffey
Defendant:
Freeport, City of, Bay View, City of, Munson Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Guzman et al v. City of Detroit et al
as 4:2021cv12290
Plaintiff:
Roberto Guzman, Khalil Muhammad and Clifford Williams
Defendant:
City of Detroit, DONALD OWENS and Nathaniel Mullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
OWENS v. City of Warren et al
as 2:2020cv12383
Defendant:
ZACHARY COOPER, City of Warren and David Rexford
Plaintiff:
DONALD OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnaby v. Mayfield et al
as 1:2020cv00232
Defendant:
Mabel J. Mayfield, James Robert Redford, Joel P. Hoekstra and others
Plaintiff:
Owen W. Barnaby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dabney v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2020cv10329
Plaintiff:
Javon Dabney
Defendant:
Detective Patrick Cecile, Detective Donald Owen, Police Officer Derrick King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv12376
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
