Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Hopson v. Spencer et al
as 3:2013cv00080
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Hopson
Defendant:
Ruth Ann Spencer, Judge Collins, Susan Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Hopson et al
as 3:2012cv00832
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Hopson
Defendant:
Goverment of Kentucky, Robert Klienfield, Adam Solinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopson v. Aguair Law Office et al
as 3:2012cv00769
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Hopson
Defendant:
Aguair Law Office, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Weinburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shanya Rainey, et al v. Jeff Patton, et al
as 12-3796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTWAN ROLAND and SHANYA RAINEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF PATTON, In his individual capacity and BRANDON GOFF, In his individual capacity
Hopson v. Huffman et al
as 3:2012cv00262
Plaintiff:
De'Andre Hopson
Defendant:
Gary Huffman, Barbara Lightsy, Bennie Lightsy and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Rainey et al v. Patton et al
as 1:2011cv00327
Plaintiff:
Shanya Rainey and Antwan Roland
Defendant:
Jeff Patton and Brandon Goff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rainey v. Powell
as 3:2009cv00343
Plaintiff:
Dannie Rainey
Defendant:
John Powell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rainey v. City of Sandusky et al
as 3:2009cv00235
Plaintiff:
Dannie Rainey
Defendant:
City of Sandusky, Sandusky Police Department and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rainey v. Erie County Department of Job and Family Services et al
as 3:2008cv02055
Plaintiff:
Dannie Rainey
Defendant:
Erie County Department of Job and Family Services, Susan Ryan Brown, Karen Balconi Ghezzi and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
