Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Madoff v. Parton et al
as 3:2010cv00631
Defendant:
Dolly Parton doing business as Dollyworld and Jonathan Lee Riches
Plaintiff:
Bernard L. Madoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Bullock et al
as 3:2010cv00621
Plaintiff:
Jesse James
Defendant:
Sandra Bullock, Janine Lindemulder and Jonathan Lee Riches
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simon Cowell, et al v. Yoga Journal, et al
as 10-5460
Plaintiff:
SIMON COWELL and MEZHGAN HUSSAINY
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
YOGA JOURNAL, aka Yoga Journal.com, dba Active Interest Media, EFREM ZIMBALIST, III, ANDREW W. CLURMAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02056
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Jonathan Riches v. Roger Goodell, et al
as 09-5864
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER GOODELL, dba National Football League Commissioner
Riches v. Goodell et al
as 3:2009cv00653
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Roger Goodell, David Stern, Gary Bettman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carl Bright, et al v. Monroe County Sheriff's Depart, et al
as 08-6177
Plaintiff:
CARL LEE BRIGHT
Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MIKE MORGAN and JEB BROWN
James Helton, et al v. Roane County, TN, et al
as 08-6146
Plaintiff:
JAMES F. HELTON, ALICE J. HELTON, KAREN S. HELTON and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
ROANE COUNTY, TN, DAVID B. HAGGARD, Sheriff of Roane County, Tennessee, ADAM WILSON and others
In Re: Southeastern Milk Antit
as 08-6127
:
In re: SOUTHEASTERN MILK ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Riches v. Aguilera et al
as 1:2007cv14469
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Christina Aguilera and Jordan Bratman
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
