Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Link v. Potter
as 2:2010cv14121
Plaintiff:
Sean Link
Defendant:
John Potter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Link v. Postmaster General for the United States
as 2:2010cv13933
Plaintiff:
Sean Link
Defendant:
Postmaster General for the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Johnson et al v. Cleveland Metropolitan School District et al
as 1:2010cv00497
Plaintiff:
Eric Johnson, Bonita Carter and Sam Cooke
Defendant:
Cleveland Metropolitan School District, Eugene Sanders, Cleveland Board of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wiles et al v. Ascom Transport System, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00028
Plaintiff:
Norma Wiles, Thomas Wiles, Theresa Gibson and others
Defendant:
Ascom Transport System, Inc., Auto Alternative, Inc., Commonwealth Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Trina Miller v. Frances Link, et al
as 09-4218
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TRINA MILLER
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCES LINK
Defendant:
GREENE COUNTY, OHIO, Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00206
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Rohan et al v. City of Edgewood et al
as 2:2008cv00240
Plaintiff:
Brian Kelly Rohan and Traci Rohan
Defendant:
City of Edgewood, City of Edgewood Police Department, Anthony Kramer and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Miller v. Link et al
as 3:2007cv00393
Plaintiff:
Trina Miller
Defendant:
Frances Link and Greene County, Ohio Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
