Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00539
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe et al v. Washington County Department of Education et al (PLR2)
as 2:2016cv00272
Plaintiff:
John Doe and James Doe
Defendant:
Washington County Department of Education , Washington County Board of Education , James E Murphy, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lewis v. Walker et al (TV2)
as 3:2016cv00486
Plaintiff:
Paul William Lewis
Defendant:
Darlene M. Walker, Thomas Barclay , Blake Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry v. Giles et al
as 3:2015cv01024
Plaintiff:
Tierra Berry
Defendant:
Blake B. Giles, Phillip Murphy, Angelo Iezzi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murray v. Williams et al (TV3)
as 3:2015cv00284
Plaintiff:
Loretta Murray, Billy Dean Murray, Bobby Dean Murray and others
Defendant:
Frank Williams, Roane County Chancellor, Denise Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00317
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murphy v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2013cv02355
Plaintiff:
Diana Murphy
Defendant:
Shelby County, Tennessee and John Doe 1-5
Miscellaneou:
Donna Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jackson-Iveson v. Sumner County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2013cv00125
Plaintiff:
Sandi Jackson-Iveson
Defendant:
Sumner County, Tennessee, Sumner County Drug Task Force, Kelly Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
