Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02027
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Irvin v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2012cv00010
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Montgomery County, Tennessee, City of Clarksville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dew v. Ashford et al
as 3:2011cv00262
Plaintiff:
Mark Dew
Defendant:
Rebecca Ashford , John Doe , James Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin v. Clarksville Gas & Water Department et al
as 3:2011cv00529
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Defendant:
Clarksville Gas & Water Department, City of Clarksville Police Department, The and Clarksville Building & Codes Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Irvin v. The State of Tennessee Appeals, et al
as 11-5179
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT THOMAS IRVIN
Defendant - Appellee:
THE STATE OF TENNESSEE APPEALS COURT and MICHAEL W. CATALANO
Irvin v. The State of Tennessee Appeals Court et al
as 3:2011cv00060
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Defendant:
The State of Tennessee Appeals Court and Michael W. Catalano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
TN, et al v. Robert Irvin
as 10-5355
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TENNESSEE, BRENDA RADFORD, Trustee for the said County of Montgomery and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT THOMAS IRVIN
Robert Irvin v. City of Clarksville Police Dep, et al
as 09-6448
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT THOMAS IRVIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CLARKSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHRIST MACMILLAN, Officer, CHARLES SMITH, Judge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-5934
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
