Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Holt v. Dickson County
as 3:2014cv01985
Plaintiff:
Natalie Holt
Defendant:
City of Dickson, The and Municipal Court Clerk for the City of Dickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lisa Peterson, et al v. James Dean, et al
as 14-5219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LISA PETERSON, MARY LYNN BUSH, DIANE CASHON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES DEAN, WALTEEN PARKER, BARBARA VANATTA, acting under color of state law and in their official capacity as members of the DeKalb County Election Commission, and individually and others
George et al v. Rhodes et al
as 2:2013cv14465
Plaintiff:
Raymond George and Creola George
Defendant:
Leo Rhodes, Darryl Chappell, Maurice Dickson and others
Allen v. Asset Acceptance LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00223
Plaintiff:
Jack Allen
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance LLC, A Dickson-Rekasi and Fulton, Friedman & Gullace, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Doss v. Asset Acceptance LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00217
Plaintiff:
Rebecca W Doss
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance LLC, A Dickson-Rekasi and Fulton, Friedman & Gullace, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McElyea v. Dickson County et al
as 3:2013cv00178
Plaintiff:
Charles H. McElyea, Jr.
Defendant:
Dickson County, Allen D. Kerns, Stephen Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charles McElyea, Jr. v. Dickson County, et al
as 12-6233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES H. MCELYEA, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DICKSON COUNTY, et al.
Morphis v. City of Dickson, Tennessee et al
as 3:2012cv00989
Plaintiff:
Emmett Joshua Morphis
Defendant:
City of Dickson, Tennessee, Seth Goodwin, Rob Peeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McElyea v. Dickson County et al
as 3:2012cv00881
Plaintiff:
Charles H. McElyea, Jr.
Defendant:
Dickson County, Larry Wallace, Nancy Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
