Cases 41 - 50 of 131
Lindon v. Saffold et al
as 1:2018cv00442
Defendant:
Shirley Strickland Saffold, Ohio Lawyers Assistance Program, Inc., ORCA House and others
Plaintiff:
James Lindon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sevier v. Governor of Ohio et al
as 1:2017cv00700
Plaintiff:
Chris Sevier
Defendant:
Governor of Ohio, Ohio Attorney General and Hamilton County Probate Judge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillispie v. Cook et al
as 3:2017cv00061
Plaintiff:
Joshua Darrell Gillispie
Defendant:
Cynthia Cook, Dennis Butts and Darke County Municipal Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Krankovich v. Rapavi et al
as 2:2017cv00140
Plaintiff:
Keturah Krankovich
Defendant:
Daniel J Rapavi and Harrison County Adult Probation Department & Head Officer John Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Doremus v. Lucas County Probate Court
as 3:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
Stanley B. Doremus
Defendant:
Lucas County Probate Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
West et al v. Hayden et al
as 3:2016cv00782
Plaintiff:
Kanora West, Denise West, K.W. and others
Defendant:
Jeroy Hayden, Jefferson County Family Court, Holton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yann Iannucci v. St of MI, et al
as 16-2214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YANN IANNUCCI
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, RICK SNYDER, Governor, BILL SCHUETTE, Attorney General and others
Newton et al v. Silvio et al
as 2:2016cv10919
Plaintiff:
John V Newton and Barry Newton
Defendant:
Reba Silvio, Gaspare Silvio, Wendy Nienhaus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roderick v. Montgomery County Probate Court et al
as 3:2016cv00037
Plaintiff:
Toni: Michelle Roderick
Defendant:
Montgomery County Probate Court and Arvin Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
