Cases 71 - 80 of 131
Glen Clayborn v. State of Tennessee, et al
as 13-5352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLEN CLAYBORN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, CHARLES TRAUGHBER, Chairman of the Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole, JAMES AUSTIN, Parole Board Member and others
Doughtie & Company, Inc. v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2013cv00209
Plaintiff:
Doughtie & Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Rutherford County , Rutherford County Probate Clerk's Office , Lisa Crowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv15416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Terry Wilson v. Oakland County Probation Offic
as 12-2564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY LOUIS WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
OAKLAND COUNTY PROBATION OFFICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-6299
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-4169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brian Kinter v. Jenise Boltz, et al
as 12-4167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN L. KINTER
Defendant - Appellee:
JENISE L. BOLTZ, CHAMPAIGN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS DOMESTIC RELATIONS-JUVENILE-PROBATE DIVISIONS, JOHN C. NEWLIN and others
Tamburino #268269 v. Ingham County Prosecutor's Office et al
as 1:2012cv00970
Plaintiff:
Dominic Tamburino #268269
Defendant:
Stuart J. Dunnings, III, Ingham County Adult Probation, Mike Bryanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michelle Mathis v. Netcare Corporation, et al
as 12-4010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHELLE R. MATHIS
Defendant - Appellee:
NETCARE CORPORATION, THE PROBATE COUNTY COURT OF OHIO, TWIN VALLEY BEHAVORIAL HEALTH and others
Michelle Mathis v. Netcare Corporation, et al
as 12-4009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHELLE R. MATHIS
Defendant - Appellee:
NETCARE CORPORATION, THE PROBATE COUNTY COURT OF OHIO, TWIN VALLEY BEHAVORIAL HEALTH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
