Cases 1 - 10 of 18,668
Morris v. Ascension Macomb Oakland Hospital et al
as 2:2024cv11502
Plaintiff:
Alexander Morris
Defendant:
Ascension Macomb Oakland Hospital, Holly Jackson and Greg Ciesielski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Foster v. Warren, City of et al
as 2:2024cv11513
Plaintiff:
Anisha Foster
Defendant:
Warren, City of and David Gifford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hill v. Provident Asset Management LLC
as 5:2024cv11500
Plaintiff:
Spring Hill
Defendant:
Provident Asset Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Hokenson v. Lansing, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Hokenson
Defendant:
Lansing, City of, Bryce Dawsey, Jim Smiertka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brush v. Grosse Pointe Public School System et al
as 2:2024cv11495
Plaintiff:
Mary Anne Brush
Defendant:
Grosse Pointe Public School System, Ahmed Ismail, Lisa Papas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Russell #747638 v. Fisk et al
as 1:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
Andrew Michael Russell #747638
Defendant:
Chad Fisk, Jonathan Kraai, Natascha Hirdes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv11487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (handicap)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
