Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Chorazghiazad v. Holmes et al
as 3:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Chorazghiazad
Defendant:
Judge Barbara Holmes and Judge Aleta A. Trauger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Larue et al v. UCOR LLC
as 3:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Nathan L. Larue, Laura Williams, J.D. Livingston and others
Defendant:
UCOR LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Windless v. Avergis et al
as 2:2022cv02754
Plaintiff:
Demetra Elaine Windless
Defendant:
Doctor John Avergis, Doctor Mary Keegan, Lisa Canady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. Ables et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
De'Lane Andre Ross
Defendant:
Larry Ables, Officer Emery, Ruth DeLange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Arwood et al v. Hamblen County Government et al (TV1)
as 3:2021cv00395
Plaintiff:
Karen Arwood, Melissa Bellew, Bonnie Bullington and others
Defendant:
Hamblen County Government, Hamblen County Legislative Body and Howard Shipley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Edwards v. Denso Manufacturing Athens Tennessee Inc.
as 1:2021cv00253
Plaintiff:
Barbara A Edwards
Defendant:
Denso Manufacturing Athens Tennessee Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drake v. FedEx Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv02636
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation, Frederick W. Smith, Molly Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
