Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SKLO Acquisitions, LLC v. City of Covington et al
as 2:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
SKLO Acquisitions, LLC
Defendant:
City of Covington, David Davidson and Dalton Belcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez v. Turner et al
as 1:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Raeann Gonzalez
Defendant:
Brandi Turner, Krystal Souders-Mutter, Samantha Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belcher v. Johnson County Kentucky Sheriff's Department et al
as 7:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Steven Douglas Belcher
Defendant:
Johnson County Kentucky Sheriff's Department, Doug Saylor, Roger Workman, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Akers et al
as 7:2019cv00059
Defendant:
Finas Akers and Kevin Belcher
Plaintiff:
Aleisha Nicole Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. City of Middletown et al
as 1:2019cv00307
Defendant:
Mark Clemons, Scott Belcher, Douglas Adkins and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew B. Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2014cv02557
Plaintiff:
Kathye P. Campbell
Defendant:
Ed Mitchell, Donald Mull, Clayton G. Bledsoe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Marrero v. Will et al
as 1:2013cv01991
Plaintiff:
Tito E. Marrero
Defendant:
Dennis P. Will, Tony Cillo, Peter Gauthier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Belcher et al v. Robertson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2013cv00161
Plaintiff:
Michael Belcher , Shelly Belcher and Taryn Spivey
Defendant:
Robertson County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
