Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Daley v. Advance Engineering Co.
as 2:2023cv11215
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daley
Defendant:
Advance Engineering Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv11008
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wadley et al v. Hazel Park School District et al
as 2:2018cv12063
Defendant:
Lynette Daley and Hazel Park School District
Plaintiff:
Serenity Wadley and Kenyette Wadley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daley v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2017cv00554
Plaintiff:
Randolph Daley
Defendant:
City of Cleveland , Michael McGrath , Martin Flask and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonds v. Daley et al
as 2:2017cv00008
Plaintiff:
Todd Bonds
Defendant:
James Daley, Marc Brandt and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daley v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2015cv02638
Defendant:
City of Cleveland , Martin Flask , Michael McGrath and others
Plaintiff:
Randolph Daley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shabazz-el-Bey v. Daley et al
as 2:2015cv00173
Plaintiff:
King-Elikim-Najashi Shabazz-el-Bey
Defendant:
James A. Daley, G. Nagle, Zachery Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Uni-Tech Environmental Services, Inc. et al v. DeWine et al
as 2:2015cv02444
Plaintiff:
Uni-Tech Environmental Services, Inc. , Donald Daley , Christina Faith and others
Defendant:
Mike DeWine , Craig W Butler and Andrew Barienbrock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Buckler et al
as 2:2014cv00051
Plaintiff:
Floyd Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Greg Buckler, James A. Daley and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Holt, et al v. Campbell County, Kentucky, et al
as 13-5953
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HOLT, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WEBER
Defendant - Appellee:
CAMPBELL COUNTY, KENTUCKY, CAMPBELL COUNTY FISCAL COURT, GREG BUCKLER, Campbell County Jailer, Individually and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
