Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Farley et al v. Potter et al (TV2)
as 3:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Chad Farley and Jessica Farley
Defendant:
Wayne Potter, Teddy Bales, Lonnie Larue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00563
Defendant:
Damon T. Hininger, CoreCivic, Inc., John Doe 1 through John Doe 10 and others
Plaintiff:
John Smith and Soynia Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark et al v. Castle et al
as 2:2020cv02417
Defendant:
JOHN DOE-5, Matthew Richmond Davis, Michael Shane Dulaney and others
Plaintiff:
Jaleta Clark, Alorea Hardwick, Ernestine Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maria Muniz-Muniz, et al v. United States Border Patrol, et al
as 16-3400
Plaintiff:
MARIA MUNIZ-MUNIZ, ROBERTO MUNIZ, ANTONIO TORRES-FRANCO and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OHIO IMMIGRANT WORKER PROJECT and FARM LABOR ORGANIZING COMMITTEE, AFL-CIO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES BORDER PATROL, Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security, JOHN DOES 19-21, individually and in their official capacities as Norwalk Ohio Police Department officers and JOHN DOES 1-9, in their capacity as United States Border Patrol Agents assigned or working from the Sandusky, Ohio Border Patrol Station
Defendant:
RANDY GALLEGOS, JOHN DOES 1-15, individually and in their capacity as United States Border Patrol Agents assigned or working from the Sandusky, Ohio United States Border Patrol Station, BRADLEY SHAVER and others
Ferriera v. Hamilton County et al
as 1:2015cv00222
Plaintiff:
Joshua Polo Ferriera
Defendant:
Hamilton County , Hamilton County Sheriff's Office , Jeremy Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smiley v. John Doe et al
as 1:2007cv02668
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Angela Smiley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
