Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv10397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv12781
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2019cv13456
Defendant:
Lance Bettison, Michigan, State of, Michigan Department of Human Services and others
Plaintiff:
Felishia Williams
Marshall v. Steeh et al
as 2:2018mc51570
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Human Services, George Caram Steeh, Bernard A. Friedman and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lamar Marshall
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Michigan Department of Human Services et al v. Langlois
as 1:2018cv00330
Petitioner:
Michigan Department of Human Services and Mackenzie Stevens
Respondent:
Jessica Langlois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Bartlett v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2017cv00565
Plaintiff:
Angel Bartlett
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Allegan County Court, Kalamazoo County Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv11107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv14138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Aelen Unan, et al v. Nick Lyon, et al
as 16-1185
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AELEN UNAN and PATRICIA QUINTINO
Defendant:
JAMES K. HAVEMAN, JR., Director, Michigan Department of Community Health and MAURA CORRIGAN, Director, Michigan Department of Human Services
Defendant - Appellee:
NICK LYON, in his official capacity as DIRECTOR, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH and DIRECTOR, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
