Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Moffett v. Platform Chroma LLC
as 5:2024cv10295
Plaintiff:
Beatriz Moffett
Defendant:
Platform Chroma LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Blevens et al v. Kentucky State Police Department et al
as 3:2021cv00571
Plaintiff:
David Gene Blevens and McKinzie Marshall
Defendant:
Kentucky State Police Department, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Sergeant Dallas Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King et al v. Moskal-Paige et al
as 2:2021cv11250
Defendant:
Andrew Patrick Litzelman, Charles Birckelbaw, Anne Birckelbaw and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin King and Nicole King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zynda et al v. Zimmer et al
as 2:2015cv11449
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Zynda , Amanda Balma , Kevin Grifka and others
Defendant:
Michael Zimmer and Sharon Moffett-Massey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis Moffett v. KY
as 14-6306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEWIS FRANCIS MOFFETT
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Moffett v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 4:2011cv00115
Plaintiff:
Lewis Moffett
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin, et al v. Ohio Governor, et al
as 2:1989cv00362
Plaintiff:
Nancy Martin , Kathy R , Claude Martin and others
Defendant:
Robert A Taft, II , Kenneth W Ritchey , Thomas J Hayes and others
Movant:
Ohio Health Care Association , John F Kirwan, Jr , Debra Lynn Moffett and others
Amicu:
Ohio Private Residential Association and Dennis J. Kucinich
Intervenor_defendant:
Heinzerling Foundation
Intervenor_plaintiff:
JOEL MARTIN , The Voice of the Retarded and The Ohio League for the Mentally Retarded
Objector:
Donna Amato et al , Paul Virgil Patterson and Anthony J. Coco
Material_witne:
Chester, Willcox & Saxbe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
