Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Moore v. Komatsu America Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv02419
Defendant:
Komatsu America Corp. and Amber Pugh
Plaintiff:
Darrin Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jackson v. Cuyahoga County et al.
as 1:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
Whitnie Jackson
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County, Department of Health and Human Services, David Merriman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Mourice Neal El v. Matt Pugh, et al
as 23-3708
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOURICE NEAL EL
Defendant / Appellee:
MATT PUGH and OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION
Pugh v. FIFTH THIRD BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 3:2022cv12028
Plaintiff:
Lizzie Pugh
Defendant:
FIFTH THIRD BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Fifth Third Financial Corporation and Old Kent Mortgage Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mourice Neal El v. Matt Pugh, et al
as 22-3871
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOURICE NEAL EL
Defendant / Appellee:
MATT PUGH and OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Pugh v. Fifth Third Bancorp et al
as 3:2022cv11433
Plaintiff:
Lizzie Pugh
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bancorp, Fifth Third Financial Corporation and Old Kent Mortgage Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Neal El v. Pugh et al
as 1:2022cv00387
Plaintiff:
Mourice Neal El
Defendant:
Matt Pugh and Department of Taxation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
