Cases 1 - 10 of 153
Crowley v. Cassidy et al
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Karen Crowley
Defendant:
Jeffrey Cassidy, Sullivan County, Tennessee, Michael Nygaard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Odell et al v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Andrew M. Odell, G. Doe, J. Doe and others
Defendant:
Bill Lee, Jim Hivner, Sara Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McCormick v. Brock et al
as 1:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
James E McCormick
Defendant:
Michael Brock, Cassie Sullivan, Isaac Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joshua Christensen v. Kingsport Sessions Court Div III, et al
as 24-5144
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MICAH CHRISTENSEN
Defendant:
KINGSPORT SESSIONS COURT DIV III, ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY and SULLIVAN COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cameron v. Ohio Utility Protection Service et al.
as 4:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Lacey Cameron
Defendant:
Ohio Utility Protection Service, Staff Right Professional Services, LLC, Kathleen Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Christensen v. Kingsport Sessions Court Div III et al
as 2:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Joshua Micah Christensen
Defendant:
Kingsport Sessions Court Div III, Assistant District Attorney and Sullivan County Public Defender's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3958
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3948
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
