Cases 91 - 100 of 164
Bennie Gamble, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, et al
as 13-6496
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENNIE L. GAMBLE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Anthony Threatt v. R. Davenport, et al
as 13-2025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY THREATT
Defendant - Appellee:
R. DAVENPORT, Unit Psychologist, TIMOTHY KIPP, Deputy Warden, BARB WESLEY, Secretary and others
Gresham #272603 v. Meder et al
as 2:2013cv00212
Plaintiff:
Michael Gresham #272603
Defendant:
Terry Meder, Kirtida A. Patel, Neil Fred Pascue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Perotti v. Helen Marberry, et al
as 13-1846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN W. PEROTTI
Defendant - Appellee:
HELEN J. MARBERRY, Warden, Individually and as Warden of Milan FDC, T. K. COZZA-RHODES, MELODY MORRIS, Individually and as DCA Secretary and Notary and others
Defendant:
DAN STECH, et al
Luginbyhl v. President of the United States et al
as 7:2013cv00043
Plaintiff:
Levi McRae Luginbyhl, Jr.
Defendant:
President of the United States, Department of Justice, State Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv10285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Demos v. United States Secretary of Defense et al
as 2:2013cv10187
Petitioner:
John Demos
Respondent:
United States Secretary of Defense, Governor of State of Washington and Barack Obama
Demos v. Obama et al
as 2:2013cv10138
Petitioner:
John Demos
Respondent:
Barack Obama, United States Secretary of Defense, United States Secretary of State and others
Demos v. U.S. Secretary of Defense
as 3:2013cv00020
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
U.S. Secretary of Defense
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Demos v. US Secretary of Defense
as 2:2012cv15664
Petitioner:
John Demos
Respondent:
US Secretary of Defense
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
