Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Blair v. Saint Lucie Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Delfon Blair, r
Defendant:
Saint Lucie Police Department and Fort Piercer Courthouse Judges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moniz v. Weipert et al
as 2:2020cv12705
Defendant:
Richard A. Bernstein, Brian K. Zahra, Monroe County Clerk and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Moniz
Belt v. Northeast Regional Health Services Administrator et al
as 0:2018cv00095
Defendant:
Jose A. Santana, Special Agent-In-Charge, FCC - Ashland, KY., Chief Psychologist, FCC/FPC/FCI - Ashland, KY and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ray Belt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adams v. Tangilag et al
as 5:2017cv00161
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Adams
Defendant:
Shastine Tangilag, Louis Forte, Correct Care Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fort v. Sloan
as 1:2016cv01449
Petitioner:
Richard Fort
Respondent:
Brigham Sloan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richard Fort v. Brigham Sloan
as 16-3477
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD FORT
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIGHAM SLOAN
Fort v. Sloan et al
as 1:2016cv00962
Petitioner:
Richard Fort
Respondent:
Brigham Sloan and State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fort v. Sloan
as 1:2016cv00551
Petitioner:
Richard Fort
Respondent:
Brigham Sloan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Forte v. Pryor et al
as 5:2015cv00122
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Joe Forte
Defendant:
Lynn Pryor, Kathy Adams and Michael Cutoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrell Ham v. Marshall County, Kentucky, et al
as 14-5043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRELL W. HAM
Defendant - Appellee:
MARSHALL COUNTY, KENTUCKY, ROGER FORD, Individually and in his official capacity as Jailer of Marshall County, Kentucky, H. W. FORD, M.D., Individually and in his official capacity as the physician of the Marshall County Detention Center and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
