Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Haney v. Rhode et al
as 2:2016cv13227
Plaintiff:
David M. Haney
Defendant:
Karen Rhode, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Corizon Insurance Company and others
Aaron Clark, IV v. S. Morgan, et al
as 15-1733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON CLARK, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
S. MORGAN, assistant resident unit supervisor, T. WINN, Warden, T. HAINES, prisoner counselor and others
Aaron Clark v. S. Morgan, et al
as 15-1673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON CLARK, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
S. MORGAN, assistant resident unit supervisor, T. WINN, Warden, T. HAINES, prisoner counselor and others
Clark v. Morgan et al
as 2:2015cv10994
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark
Defendant:
S. Morgan, T. Winn, T. Haines and others
Plaster #846864 v. Heyns et al
as 2:2015cv00014
Plaintiff:
Robert Plaster #846864
Defendant:
Daniel Heyns, Lloyd W. Rapelije, Jeffrey Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eagle #525192 v. Michigan State Industries et al
as 2:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
Johnny Dar Eagle #525192
Defendant:
Michigan State Industries, Rick Snyder, Daniel Heyns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caver #200563 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00171
Plaintiff:
Larry Terrill Caver #200563
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Access Securpak Company, Narcotics Analysis Reagent Mark II Kit Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith #153086 v. Heyns et al
as 2:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
Raymond Smith #153086
Defendant:
Daniel Heyns, Jeffrey Woods, Thomas Mackie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Mohr et al
as 2:2012cv00675
Plaintiff:
Mark R Russell
Defendant:
Gary C Mohr and Lester Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson #324642 v. Beak et al
as 2:2012cv00205
Plaintiff:
Corielle Johnson #324642
Defendant:
Leslie Beak, Daniel Heyns, Unknown Curley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
