Cases 11 - 20 of 153
Simone v. City of Cleveland
as 1:2023cv01114
Plaintiff:
James Simone
Defendant:
City of Cleveland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jones #701358 v. Washington et al
as 1:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Martell Jones #701358
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Kenneth McKee, David Dawdy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans #367619 v. Atearn et al
as 1:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Alrelio Evans #367619
Defendant:
J. Atearn, Matthew Macauley, R. Browkaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans #367619 v. Tinerella et al
as 1:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Alrelio Evans #367619
Defendant:
Unknown Tinerella, Unknown Rubley, Unknown West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans #367619 v. Houghton et al
as 1:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
Alrelio Evans #367619
Defendant:
Adam Houghton, Diane Suppes, C. Waterman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simons v. Palmer et al
as 2:2023cv10654
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Simons
Defendant:
Palmer, Ford, Sims and others
Simon v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2023cv00461
Petitioner:
Shawn C. Simon
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willie Curtis v. Simon, et al
as 22-2156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE BEASLEY CURTIS
Defendant / Appellee:
PRISON COUNSELOR SIMON, TIMOTHY S. FLANAGAN, Parole Board Member and CRISSA BLANKENBURG, Parole Board Member
Novelle Palomino v. Cuyahoga County, OH, et al
as 22-4076
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOVELLE PALOMINO
Defendant / Appellee:
CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OH, CLEVELAND, OH POLICE DEPARTMENT, 601, MARITZA MENDEZ and others
Ryan v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2022cv13002
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Michigan Department of Corrections, Corizon Healthcare, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
