Cases 11 - 20 of 663
White v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv10550
Plaintiff:
Mark White
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, MDOC, Smith and others
White v. Mosley et al
as 2:2024cv10506
Plaintiff:
Mark White
Defendant:
Marvin Mosley, Sergeant Garrow, Serena Landfair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Shaverlier et al
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
LaMarcus Valentino Berry
Defendant:
Unknown Shaverlier, Unknown Dunham, Bradley Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young #194860 v. Schroeder et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Young #194860
Defendant:
Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2 and Sarah Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Springhetti et al
as 2:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jason Thompson
Defendant:
Scott Springhetti, Luke McKee, Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Daniel v. Trowbridge et al
as 5:2024cv10393
Plaintiff:
Allen David Daniel
Defendant:
Beth Trowbridge, Deborah Foster, Howard and others
Woodley Sr. v. Young et al
as 2:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Defendant:
David C Young, Evan Poole, Toure' McCord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirkwood v. Kent, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Sally Kirkwood
Defendant:
Kent, County of, Michelle LaJoye-Young, Charles DeWitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Wright et al.
as 1:2024cv00251
Petitioner:
Corvin Jauwan Young
Respondent:
Sheriff Chuck Wright, Alan Wilson, Donald J. Zelenka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. LaJoye-Young
as 1:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Mark Allen Hill
Defendant:
Michelle LaJoye-Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
