Cases 21 - 30 of 210
Nathaniel Rice v. Richard Jones, et al
as 23-3373
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL D. RICE
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF RICHARD K. JONES, WARDEN/CAPTAIN NICK FISHER, LIEUTENANT ADAMS and others
Muya v. Little et al
as 1:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Dadiri Muya
Defendant:
Little, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Aramark Food Service et al
as 2:2023cv02137
Plaintiff:
Christian Pitts
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service, Shelby County Sheriff Office, Wellpath Healthcare Provider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunlap v. Fish et al
as 3:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dunlap
Defendant:
Robin Fish, Lakeia Wells, f/n/u Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tony Vandee v. Dickerson, et al
as 23-1139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONY LEROY VANDEE
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DICKERSON, MDOC, JOHN DOE #1, Correctional Officer with MDOC, JOHN DOE #2, Correctional Officer with MDOC and others
Edwards v. Valentine et al
as 3:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Morris Richard Edwards
Defendant:
Anna Valentine, Wellpath Health Care Services, Christina Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. Baldwin et al
as 2:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Richard Scott Rose
Defendant:
Dallas Baldwin and Nurse Jane Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carswell v. Edwards et al
as 2:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Andrew Carswell
Defendant:
Lucas Edwards, Nicholas Stowe, John Doe (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lucas v. Cassidy et al
as 1:2022cv00774
Plaintiff:
Angel Marie Lucas
Defendant:
Correction Officer Cassidy, Scioto County Sheriff Office, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
