Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Sean Ryan v. MDOC, et al
as 14-1442
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAN MICHAEL RYAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, UNKNOWN STODDARD, Warden, UNKNOWN JENSEN, Correctional Officer and others
Robinson #515217 et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00165
Plaintiff:
Dayon King #527662 and Michael Robinson #515217
Defendant:
Aaron Rutgers, Joseph Tefft, Jeffrey Sisson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner #169637 v. Jensen et al
as 1:2013cv00249
Plaintiff:
Gregory S. Turner #169637
Defendant:
P. Jensen, Craig Shreve, P. Shroad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone #489704 v. Crompton et al
as 1:2011cv00821
Plaintiff:
Rubin Lamont Stone #489704
Defendant:
Robert Crompton , Terry Malloy , Nicki J. Monore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones #707629 v. Jensen et al
as 1:2011cv00514
Plaintiff:
James Jones #707629
Defendant:
Unknown Jensen and Unknown Jameason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones #758104 v. Jensen et al
as 1:2011cv00468
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Jones #758104
Defendant:
Unknown Jensen and Unknown Mawer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jensen #660464 v. Berghuis
as 1:2011cv00224
Petitioner:
Daniel Jensen #660464
Respondent:
Mary Berghuis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hursey #273259 v. Shirk et al
as 1:2010cv01277
Plaintiff:
Dashi Hursey #273259
Defendant:
N. Klinesmith, Unknown Shroad, Patricia Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark #183908 v. Curtin et al
as 1:2010cv00818
Plaintiff:
Michael Belike Clark #183908
Defendant:
Cindi Curtin, Anita Young, Robert Crompton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jensen v. Warden, Pickaway Correctional Institution
as 2:2010cv00141
Petitioner:
Ronald Jensen
Respondent:
Warden, Pickaway Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
