Cases 21 - 30 of 1,522
Nichols v. Warnecke
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Randy Dean Nichols
Defendant:
John Michael Warnecke, Mathew Ellis, Adam Rummer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jackson v. Thurmond et al
as 1:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Marlon R. Jackson
Defendant:
Mark A. Thurmond and J. Corey Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Thurmond et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Marlon R. Jackson
Defendant:
Mark A. Thurmond and J. Corey Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
David McDonald
Defendant:
Karl Jackson and Obion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Cuyahoga Court of Common Pleas et al.
as 1:2023cv02388
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jackson
Defendant:
Cuyahoga Court of Common Pleas, Judge Daniel Gaul, Judge Joan Synenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Douglas Jackson v. Nathan Hoffman
as 23-2065
Petitioner / Appellant:
DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
NATHAN HOFFMAN, Warden
Jackson v. Harmon et al
as 1:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Marlon R. Jackson
Defendant:
Steve Harmon and Capt. Lindsey Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Aramark Correctional Services LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03985
Defendant:
Lt. David Sandridge, Aramark Correctional Services LLC, Jane/John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip A. Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pryor v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 4:2023cv02259
Plaintiff:
Nc LaFonse Pryor and Norman LaFonte Pryor
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Lieutinent Arianna Brock, M. Darkangelo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Jackson v. USA
as 23-5986
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL D. JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
