Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Carmichael v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 2:2012cv13594
Plaintiff:
Karlos Carmichael
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Nick Ludwick, Scott L Holmes and others
Papaioan v. Riley et al
as 5:2011cv00082
Plaintiff:
Mihail I. Papaioan
Defendant:
Natalie C. Riley , Amanda Hughes , Rick Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Weymouth et al v. Hughes et al
as 3:2010cv01039
Plaintiff:
Daniel Anthony Weymouth, Patrick J. Simpson, Jonathan Lee Riches and others
Defendant:
Amanda Hughes, Kristen Hungness, Natalie Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick Simpson, et al v. Natalie Riley, et al
as 10-6018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK J. SIMPSON, DANIEL ANTHONY WEYMOUTH, RICHARD GALIETTI and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NATALIE RILEY, RDAP Staff, AMANDA HUGHES, RDAP Staff and HICKEY, Warden
Patrick Simpson, et al v. Natalie Riley, et al
as 10-5994
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK J. SIMPSON, DANIEL ANTHONY WEYMOUTH, RICHARD GALIETTI and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NATALIE RILEY, RDAP Staff, AMANDA HUGHES, RDAP Staff and HICKEY, Warden
Riches et al v. Hungness et al
as 5:2010cv00279
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Richard Gulietti, Daniel Anthony Weymouth and others
Defendant:
Kristen Hungness, Amanda Hughes, Natalie Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Riley et al
as 5:2010cv00138
Plaintiff:
Patrick Simpson
Defendant:
Natalie Riley, Amanda L. Hughes and Hickey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Papaioan v. Riley et al
as 5:2010cv00088
Plaintiff:
Mihail I. Papaioan
Defendant:
Natalie C. Riley, Amanda Hughes, Rick Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ray v. Caruso et al
as 5:2008cv15208
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Correctional Medical Services, George Pramstaller and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
