Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Smith v. Dewberry et al
as 2:2012cv14702
Plaintiff:
Deanna Smith
Defendant:
Dewberry, J Hill, Froclyma and others
Smith v. Beshear et al
as 5:2012cv00092
Plaintiff:
Herbert R. Smith
Defendant:
Steven L. Beshear, LaDonna Thompson, Thomas L. Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry Bethune v. Mary Berghuis, et al
as 12-1636
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY BETHUNE
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Warden, Warden, R. SMITH, Deputy Warden, MARY BERGHUIS, Warden and others
Defendant:
DANIEL SPITTERS, Physician Assistant
Herbert Smith v. USA, et al
as 11-6437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERBERT R. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, CAROL PAVILACK GETTY and others
Defendant:
US PAROLE COMMISSION, US MARSHALL SERVICE and UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS
Herbert Smith v. John Rees, et al
as 11-6367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERBERT R. SMITH
Defendant:
JOHN D. REES, et al
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE HILAND, MD, TERRI JONES and BRUCE BAUER
Herbert Smith v. USA, et al
as 11-5966
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERBERT R. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, US PAROLE COMMISSION, US MARSHALL SERVICE and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS
Herbert Smith v. USA, et al
as 11-5895
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERBERT R. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, US PAROLE COMMISSION, US MARSHALL SERVICE and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS
Cox #363033 v. Caruso et al
as 2:2010cv00354
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Cox #363033
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, J. Gracik, Tameria Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Superintendent
as 1:2010cv01196
Petitioner:
Claudell R. Smith
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cox v. Caruso et al CASE TRANSFERRED
as 2:2010cv14562
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Cox
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, J Gracik, Tameria Hamilton and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
