Cases 31 - 40 of 171
Maisano v. Ulibarri et al
as 3:2014cv02243
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Betty Ulibarri, Tom Horne, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Ulibarri et al
as 3:2014cv02254
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Betty Ulibarri, Tom Horne, Jan Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Ulibarri et al
as 3:2014cv02253
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Betty Ulibarri, Jan Brewer, Tom Horne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Ulibarri et al
as 3:2014cv02252
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Betty Ulibarri, (f/n/u) Frame, C. Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Hood #235278 v. Jeffrey Woods, et al
as 14-2114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD KING HOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY WOODS, Warden, Warden, NICK LUDWICK, Warden, RICHARD STAPLETON, Hearings Administrator and others
Lacy Jr. # 141241 v. Duell et al
as 1:2014cv00537
Defendant:
Randy Duell, Deanna Arksey, Crystal Galvan-Casas and others
Plaintiff:
George Lee Lacy # 141241, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2014cv02295
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Jones, III
Defendant:
City of Memphis, State of TN, Shelby County D.A. Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devon Parker v. Fontella Mason, et al
as 14-5373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEVON J. PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
FONTELLA MASON, Alternative Disciplinary Hearing Officer
Defendant:
JOE EASTERLING, Warden, HCCF Warden, DARLENE MATTHEWS, Librarian, JOANNE HENSON, Unit Manager and others
Marcellus Betty v. Arvil Chapman
as 14-5339
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARCELLUS BETTY
Respondent - Appellee:
ARVIL CHAPMAN, "Butch"
Smalley v. Hamindiner et al
as 1:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smalley
Defendant:
Damon Hamindiner, Arvil Chapman, Daniel Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
