Cases 31 - 40 of 704
Alfred Johnson, Sr. v. Annette Chambers-Smith, et al
as 23-3810
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED A. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director, DAVID GRAY, Warden, C. SCOTT, DWO and others
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, Jr., et al
as 23-5869
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN THOMAS FOWLKES, JR., DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
Todd King, Sr. v. Chae Harris
as 23-3758
Petitioner / Appellant:
TODD A. KING, SR.
Respondent / Appellee:
CHAE HARRIS, Warden
Howard v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority et al
as 1:2023cv01785
Plaintiff:
William Jack Howard, Sr.
Defendant:
Ohio Adult Parole Authority and Warden Jennifer Gillece Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman, Sr. v. State of Indiana, The et al
as 3:2023cv00968
Petitioner:
Albert D.M. Chatman, Sr.
Respondent:
State of Indiana, The, (f/n/u) Reddman, (f/n/u) Olmstead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Brown, Sr. v. Lee
as 1:2023cv01184
Plaintiff:
James D. Brown, Sr.
Defendant:
Robert James Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson, Sr. v. Madison County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv01185
Plaintiff:
Dontavious Montez Anderson, Sr.
Defendant:
Madison County Jail, Madison County Sheriff's Department, Hunter Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Gray
as 4:2023cv01650
Petitioner:
Aaron L. Jones, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden David W. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grooms v. Cox et al
as 2:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Cedric Jordan Grooms, Sr.
Defendant:
Casey Cox, Tim Clafflin, John Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kyle et al v.
as 1:2023mc00024
Petitioner:
Lowell H Kyle, Sr, Colton Drake Clingan, Larry Leland Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
