Cases 51 - 60 of 155
Moose-Bey v. United States et al
as 6:2018cv00317
Defendant:
Kenneth Michael Warner, United States, David M. Ketchmark and others
Plaintiff:
Thirplus Tino Moose-Bey and Thirplus Moose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moose v. USA et al
as 6:2018cv00272
Defendant:
J.E. Krueger, Mr. Fardel, John or Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Thirplus Moose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv12932
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv12683
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Young v. Sessions et al
as 2:2018cv00700
Defendant:
United States, US Attorney, Southern District Ohio, Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 6:2018cv00128
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Walker
Defendant:
J.C. Holland, Joe Doe, Rhonda Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Galloway v. Merlack et al
as 4:2018cv00760
Plaintiff:
Charles Leonard Galloway
Defendant:
Steven Merlack, Dr. Dunlop, Nurse Tomko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2017cv00347
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Walker
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, FMC Lexington, Chaney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sapp v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv13691
Plaintiff:
Lamount M. Sapp
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Anderson v. Department of Justice/Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2017cv00353
Plaintiff:
Leonard C. Anderson
Defendant:
Department of Justice/Bureau of Prisons, Medical Staff and Christopher E Gross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
