Cases 61 - 70 of 222
Starr v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 3:2019cv02934
Defendant:
John and Jane Does #1-3 ODRC Policymakers, Joseph Hughey, Warden Lyneal Wainwright and others
Plaintiff:
Sherwood Starr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Warden, USP McCreary et al
as 6:2019cv00291
Petitioner:
James Thompson
Defendant:
Warden, USP McCreary, John and Jane Does, USP McCreary Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jacobs v. USP McCreary et al
as 6:2019cv00286
Defendant:
Warden, USP McCreary, USP McCreary and John or Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Cory Lee Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watts v. USA et al
as 7:2019cv00113
Plaintiff:
Katrina Watts
Defendant:
Gregory Kizziah, United States Penitentiary Big Sandy, John and Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner v. John and Jane Does
as 2:2019cv04495
Defendant:
Michael Siewert, M. Riley, Deputy Blade and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Bonner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kaminski v. Cuyahoga County, et al.
as 1:2019cv01954
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, Cuyahoga County Jail, Cuyahoga County and others
Plaintiff:
Greg J. Kaminski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scarbro v. Pinkney, et al.
as 1:2019cv01593
Defendant:
John Does and Janes Does 1-3, MetroHealth System, Clifford Pinkney and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scarbro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Decosta v. Cuyahoga County Ohio, et al.
as 1:2019cv01584
Defendant:
John Doe/ Jane Doe Corrections Officers, Eric J. Ivet, Ken Mills and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy Decosta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moler v. Lawson et al
as 6:2019cv00149
Defendant:
Angela Dunbar, Christopher Mabe, Ms. J. Free and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aguilar v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2019cv01216
Defendant:
Unit Manager Chief McDonald, Bryan Wellinghoff, John and Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Aguilar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
