Cases 61 - 70 of 1,229
Godsey v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Bobby Godsey
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cathey v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Eric Cathey
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Downs v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Audrey E. Downs
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gillispie v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Jermuriel Gillispie
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaffer v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Jacob Shaffer
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Derwin Valentino Thomas
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Enix v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
Tyler Ward Enix
Respondent:
State of Tennessee and Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell et al v. McCracken County Jail Officers
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell, Michelle Bennett, Tabatha Bourgoin and others
Defendant:
McCracken County Jail Officers, Officers Phillips, Officers Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Rathal Perkins
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patrick Carmody v. TDOC, et al
as 24-5243
Plaintiff:
PATRICK S. CARMODY
Defendant:
TDOC, FRANK STRADA, Commissioner, in his individual and official capacities, LEE DOTSON, Asst. Commissioner, in his official and individual capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
