Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Wall v. Koellien
as 3:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
James Brent Wall
Defendant:
Deputy f/n/u Koellien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lark v. Thomas et al
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Tunisia Lark
Defendant:
Sharne Thomas, David Vanwinkle, Zachary Defouw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Mark Yates and Wall & Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
Mark Yates, Wall & Associates, Inc., John P. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WALL v. LUPPE et al
as 3:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
NATHAN CLAUDE WALL
Defendant:
Heather Huppe, CAPTAIN BRIAN CAVE, KATIE CAVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alford Jr v. Wall et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Alford Jr
Defendant:
John Wall, John Hellman, John Crace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cullen v. Wall et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Fathi Mushapha Cullen and Larry D. Alford Jr
Defendant:
John Wall, John Hellman, John Crace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattison v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mattison, Noah Rashad Lyles, Lane Douglas Hills and others
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, Josh Hyatt and Roger Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls v. Phillips et al
as 3:2023cv01288
Plaintiff:
Marlon Walls
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALL v. DICKSON COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2023cv00850
Plaintiff:
NATHAN CLAUDE WALL
Defendant:
Dickson County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weakley v. Bailey et al
as 1:2022cv00982
Plaintiff:
Travell Maurice Lynn Weakley
Defendant:
L. Paul Bailey, K. Robbins, A. Tober and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
