Cases 1 - 10 of 603
Perry v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Perry
Defendant:
Yolanda Williams, Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Downs v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Audrey E. Downs
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Benson
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Braddie E. Sullivan
Defendant:
Connie Benson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Aramark et al
as 2:2024cv02146
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Williams, Corey D. Lurry and Jamal Moore
Defendant:
Aramark, Shelby County Sheriff Office, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Dr. Ryzhkova et al
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Braddie E. Sullivan
Defendant:
Dr. Ryzhkova, Ms. Paden, Ms. Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Mark Yates and Wall & Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
Mark Yates, Wall & Associates, Inc., John P. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hamblin v. Alexander et al
as 2:2024cv02015
Plaintiff:
Robert Hamblin
Defendant:
Anthony Alexander, Mr. Doctor Morton, Erica N. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tripp v. Bailey
as 1:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Timothy G. Tripp
Defendant:
Amber E. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Lawson et al
as 2:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Martin E. Hughes
Defendant:
Ronnie Lawson, Butch Gallion, Autumn Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryson v. Knox County TN et al
as 3:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
Danielle E Bryson
Defendant:
Knox County TN, Robert Cooter, LT B Keck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
