Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Polk v. USA
as 1:2023cv01098
Petitioner:
Rico Polk
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hamby v. Hopper et al
as 3:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
William D. Hamby, Jr.
Defendant:
Ms. Hopper, Ms. Perry, Ms. Polk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gene Polk v. USA
as 22-1684
Petitioner / Appellant:
GENE POLK
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Marcus Polk v. Tony Parker, et al
as 22-5506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS D. POLK
Defendant / Appellee:
TONY PARKER, TDOC Commissioner, in his individual capacity, RUBENARD RISPER, Chief of Security at Trousdale Turner Correctional Complex, in his individual and official capacity, YOLANDA PITTMAN, Associate Warden, in her individual and official capacity and others
McCord v. Sullivan County Correctional Facilty et al
as 2:2022mc00009
Plaintiff:
James C. McCord
Defendant:
Sullivan County Correctional Facilty, State of Tennessee, Polk County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCord v. Polk County Jail et al
as 2:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
James Collin McCord
Defendant:
Polk County Jail, Polk County Police Dpt. and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shields v. Sheriff of Polk County
as 1:2021cv00298
Plaintiff:
Matt Shields
Defendant:
Sherriff of Polk County, Officer Steve Ross, Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morton v. Polk
as 2:2020cv02743
Defendant:
Officer Polk
Plaintiff:
Dennis Morton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Polk v. Armstrong
as 1:2020cv01047
Plaintiff:
Marcus D. Polk
Defendant:
Sarah Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Polk v. Parker et al
as 3:2020cv00069
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Alexa Hawkins, F/N/U Risper and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus D. Polk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
