Cases 1 - 10 of 164
Sims v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2024cv01070
Petitioner:
Jeremy Sims
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims #770573 v. Schimmelpenny et al
as 2:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Dantrell Jayvone Sims #770573
Defendant:
Unknown Schimmelpenny, Unknown Balbierz, Unknown Party #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv01237
Petitioner:
Ronnie D. Sims, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bolden v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv12497
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bolden
Defendant:
John Doe A, John Doe B, John Doe C and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims, Jr. v. State of Tennessee, The
as 3:2023cv00992
Petitioner:
Ronnie D. Sims, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bolden #835167 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bolden #835167
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Gretchen Whitmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims #663137 v. Jarvis
as 2:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Eric Sims #663137
Defendant:
Unknown Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCarren et al v. Fresard et al
as 2:2023cv12135
Plaintiff:
Michael D McCarren, Maurice A Stewart, Charles Whitman and others
Defendant:
Patricia Fresard, Richard Lynch, Zenbell Brown and others
Bryan Sparks v. Thomas Teodosio, et al
as 23-3545
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN SCOTT SPARKS
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS A. TEODOSIO, SHERRI BEVAN WALSH, SUSAN BAKER ROSS and others
Lorenz v. Rushiney et al
as 2:2023cv11040
Plaintiff:
Ryan Anthony Lorenz
Defendant:
Rushiney, Vann, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
