Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Bowen v. RCADC et al
as 3:2023cv01179
Plaintiff: Walter T. Bowen, Jr.
Defendant: RCADC and Rudd Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02433
Petitioner: Terry Bowen
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bowen v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv02833
Petitioner: Tony Bowen
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Howard v. Bowens et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00310
Plaintiff: Lezzerio Howard
Defendant: Daphne Bowens and Lee Ann Hamblin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ardoin v. Bowens et al
as 2:2022cv02255
Petitioner: Kevin Ardoin
Respondent: Warden Bowens, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Baxter v. Berwangner et al
as 2:2022cv02239
Plaintiff: Robert Baxter
Defendant: J. Berwangner, F/N/U Flowers, Warden Bowens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bowen v. Jone et al
as 2:2017cv02624
Plaintiff: Danerrio Bowen
Defendant: William Jone and SCDC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Crowell et al (JRG2)
as 2:2016cv00321
Plaintiff: Tommy Earl Jones
Defendant: Georgia Crowell, Rita Reece and Amy Bowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Clement et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00257
Plaintiff: Tommy Earl Jones
Defendant: Bernard Clement, Amy Bowen, Georgia Crowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisher v. Schofield et al
as 3:2016cv00089
Plaintiff: Howard Porter Fisher
Defendant: Derrick Schofield, Bill Haslam, Metropolitan Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?