Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Boyer v. Ray
as 2:2024cv00003
Plaintiff: Keith J. Boyer
Defendant: Shawnee Ray and Kenton County, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyer v. KCDC Medical Staff
as 2:2023cv00172
Plaintiff: Keith J. Boyer
Defendant: KCDC Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCarren et al v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv13129
Plaintiff: Michael David McCarren, Maurice Stewart, Levertis Riley and others
Defendant: Raphael Washington, Robert Dunlap, Boyer and others
Bounds v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv13078
Plaintiff: Deshaun Lamar Bounds
Defendant: Raphael Washington, Mike Jamar, Boyer and others
McCarren et al v. Washington et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv12324
Plaintiff: Michael D. McCarren, Walter L. Galloway, Maurice A Stewart and others
Defendant: Raphael Washington, Robert Dunlap, Boyer and others
Jeffery Johnson v. Jennifer Briarly, et al
as 23-5741
Plaintiff / Appellant: JEFFERY JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee: JENNIFER PARKS BRIARLY, OFFICER JOANNA TIPTON, WARDEN ANNA VALENTINE and others
William Boyer v. Amy Robey, et al
as 23-5655
Petitioner / Appellant: WILLIAM LEE BOYER
Respondent / Appellee: AMY ROBEY, Warden and DANIEL J. CAMERON, Attorney General
Ewing v. Washington et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv12127
Plaintiff: Darrell Rashard Ewing
Defendant: Raphael Washington, FNU Allen, FNU Boyer and others
Boyer v. Robey et al
as 1:2022cv00061
Petitioner: William L. Boyer
Respondent: Amy Robey and Daniel Camron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Topper et al
as 2:2022cv02228
Plaintiff: William Mark Hill
Defendant: F/N/U Topper, F/N/U Woodland and F/N/U Boyd or Boyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?