Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Barrett v. Martinez, et al.
as 2:2016cv00510
Plaintiff:
Joshua Barrett
Defendant:
Diego Martinez, Josh Montgomery, Gary Krisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cross #150443 v. Cook et al
as 2:2013cv00318
Plaintiff:
Alloysius Cross #150443
Defendant:
Charles Cook, Marquita Malette, Duncan MacLaren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Cook v. Cashler, et al
as 13-2065
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT CHARLES COOK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN CASHLER, RUO, WADE WAKEFIELD, RUO, MARK SUTHERBY, Assistant Deputy Warden and others
Defendant:
LINDA THOMPSON, Business Officer Manager, et al.
Robert Cook v. Cashler, et al
as 13-1951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT CHARLES COOK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN CASHLER, RUO, WADE WAKEFIELD, RUO, MARK SUTHERBY, Assistant Deputy Warden and others
Defendant:
LINDA THOMPSON, Business Officer Manager, et al.
Hubbard #175230 v. Recla et al
as 2:2012cv00469
Plaintiff:
Eric Hubbard #175230
Defendant:
Richard Recla, Charles Cook, Mark Fountain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin King v. Charles Cook, et al
as 12-1385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN KING
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES COOK, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor of Kinross Correctional Facility, in his individual capacity and JEFFREY WOODS
Cook #128535 v. Cashler et al
as 1:2011cv00637
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Cook #128535
Defendant:
Unknown Cashler, Wade Wakefield, Mark O. Sutherby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riddle #180984 v. Caruso et al
as 2:2010cv00156
Plaintiff:
Marcel Riddle #180984
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Jeffrey Woods, Lou Berlinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin King v. Charles Cook, et al
as 08-2302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN KING
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES COOK and JEFFREY WOODS
King #171671 v. Cook et al
as 2:2007cv00122
Plaintiff:
Kevin King #171671
Defendant:
Charles Cook and Jeffrey Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
