Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jones v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02039
Petitioner:
Jeremy David Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Jones v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02038
Petitioner:
Jeremy David Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Brewster v. Robertson County Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv01348
Plaintiff:
Joshua Brewster
Defendant:
Robertson County Tennessee, Robertson County Jail, Marshal Gillis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brewster v. Robertson County Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv01349
Plaintiff:
Joshua Brewster
Defendant:
Robertson County Tennessee, Robertson County Jail, Sergeant David Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
as 1:2017cv00741
Petitioner:
David Jones
Respondent:
Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Wainwright
as 3:2017cv02289
Petitioner:
David Jones
Respondent:
Lyneal Wainwright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hatcher v. Light et al
as 2:2014cv00318
Plaintiff:
Shamsiddeen Isiah Hatcher
Defendant:
Gordon Light, Brad Tate, Ginger Crowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruno Choiniere v. J.S. Walton
as 12-2477
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRUNO CHOINIERE
Respondent - Appellee:
J.S. WALTON, Warden, DONALD J. SCHMID, ROBERT L. MILLER and others
Jones v. Crittended County Jail Administration and Staff et al
as 2:2009cv02798
Plaintiff:
David Jones
Defendant:
Crittended County Jail Administration and Staff, Arkansas State Hospital and Molden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Booker et al
as 2:2007cv14017
Plaintiff:
David Jones
Defendant:
Raymond Booker and MDOC
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
