Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Kevin Giles v. Christopher Swanson, et al
as 24-1473
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LA'VON GILES
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER R. SWANSON, Sheriff, KAY [UNKNOWN], Nurse, LIZ [UNKNOWN], Nurse and others
Kevin Giles v. Christopher Swanson, et al
as 24-1389
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LA'VON GILES
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER R. SWANSON, Sheriff, KAY [UNKNOWN], Nurse, LIZ [UNKNOWN], Nurse and others
Loyde v. Odom et al
as 2:2024cv02202
Plaintiff:
Ed Henry Loyde
Defendant:
Sheriff Odom, John Doe - Officer, Jane Doe - Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Baker et al
as 5:2020cv00199
Defendant:
Mayor Linda Gorton, Chief Lawrence Weathers, Brian Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nutt v. Seta et al
as 1:2019cv00460
Defendant:
Sgt. Michael Barge, P.O. Paul Vollner, P.O. Christopher Seta and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Nutt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Carnine et al
as 1:2019cv00060
Defendant:
David McLlwain, John Doe Officers, Jeffrey Carnine and others
Plaintiff:
David Adam Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crowe v. Pounders et al
as 2:2018cv02885
Defendant:
AWO Jones, Nurse Practitioners (2), Core Civic and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Neal Crowe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lorenzo Johnson v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 17-1633
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORENZO JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEVEN RATA, Officer and others
Robert Matthews, et al v. James Craige, et al
as 16-2185
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MATTHEWS
Plaintiff:
E. M., a Minor and X. M., a Minor
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES CRAIGE, Chief of Police, CITY OF DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT and JOHN DOE, Officer
Van Jenkins v. MDOC, et al
as 16-1080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VAN JENKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PAROLE BOARD, ABSCONDER RECOVERY UNIT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
