Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Brown #464263 v. Storey
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Bruce K. Brown #464263
Defendant:
Unknown Storey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith #267009 et al v. Brock et al
as 1:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Derrick Smith, Chauvez Chavez, J.B. and others
Defendant:
Google LLC, Google Inc, Microsoft LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith #267009 v. Brock et al
as 1:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lee Smith #267009
Defendant:
Jason Brock, G. Scanlon and K. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cardello-Smith v. JPay, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv10340
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cardello-Smith and Patricia Lee Thompson
Defendant:
JPay, LLC, JPAY- Securus/securis Technologies Company, JPAY Corporation and others
North #289996 et al v. Scanlon et al
as 1:2021cv00518
Defendant:
Gayle Scanlon, Darrell M. Steward, M. Burk and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Thompson, Derrick Lee Smith #267009 and Christopher North #289996
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles #933948 v. Scanlon et al
as 1:2021cv00074
Defendant:
K. Brown, Bobbi Dixon-Ingalls, G. Scanlon and others
Plaintiff:
Byron M. Miles #933948
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce Brown v. Lloyd Rapelje
as 13-1197
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRUCE K BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
LLOYD RAPELJE, Appellee
Mayes v. Corizon Corp. et al
as 2:2012cv14681
Plaintiff:
Iyan Mayes
Defendant:
Corizon Corp., Michelle L. Schulcz, Angela K. Brown and others
Duane Brown v. Terry Collins, et al
as 10-3012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUANE K. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY J. COLLINS, Warden, Director, Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections and CYNTHIA B. MAUSSER, Chairperson, Ohio Parole Board
Brown v. Collins et al
as 3:2009cv01655
Plaintiff:
Duane K. Brown
Defendant:
Terry J. Collins and Cynthia B. Mausser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
