Cases 1 - 10 of 10
McClelland v. State of Ohio et al
as 5:2022cv01928
Petitioner:
Dennis McClelland, II
Respondent:
State of Ohio and John Doe Others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McClelland v. City of Steubenville
as 2:2020cv05331
Defendant:
Michael Hyde and City of Steubenville
Plaintiff:
Montel M. McClelland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin v. McClelland
as 1:2020cv00825
Plaintiff:
Jordan A. Goodwin
Defendant:
Judge Robert McClelland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClelland v. Barry et al
as 5:2016cv02457
Plaintiff:
Dennis McClelland, II
Defendant:
Steve Barry, M. Troutman and Summit County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Roberson v. Cuyahoga County Ohio, et al
as 11-4403
Petitioner - Appellant:
CURTIS ROBERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
CUYAHOGA COUNTY OHIO, TIMOTHY J. MCGINTY, WILLIAM D. MASON and others
Roberson v. Cuyahoga County Ohio et al
as 1:2011cv02202
Petitioner:
Curtis Roberson
Respondent:
Cuyahoga County Ohio , Timothy J. McGinty, William D. Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McClelland v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv02181
Petitioner:
Charles McClelland
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Riches v. Jones et al
as 5:2009cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery, Jay Harris and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Daniel v. Granholm
as 2:2008cv10999
Plaintiff:
Allen Daniel and Maryleen Emerson-Baily
Defendant:
Jennifer Granholm, Michigan Attorney General's Office, Mike Cox and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
McClelland v. United States of America
as 2:2007cv02608
Petitioner:
Charles McClelland
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
