Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gomez v. City of Canton Police Department et al
as 5:2023cv01788
Plaintiff:
Omar R. Gomez
Defendant:
City of Canton Police Department, Detective Michael Walker, Ohio Adult Parole Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. USA
as 2:2016cv12091
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Michael Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Raleem et al v. Ward et al
as 5:2015cv13104
Plaintiff:
Raleem, Iesha Northington, Chris Jackson and others
Defendant:
A. Ward, Kevin Rogers, G. Kamin and others
Tyree Smith, et al v. F. Estes, et al
as 15-5783
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYREE SMITH
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WRIGHT, CHARLES A. NELSON, COURTNEY STROGGINS, (Discharged) and others
Defendant - Appellee:
F. ESTES, (Former) Cpl., M. SPENCER, (Former) C/O, JULIA CAMPBELL, Sgt. and others
Raleem-X et al v. Ward et al
as 2:2015cv11905
Plaintiff:
Raleem-X, Iesha Northington, Poncietta Earle and others
Defendant:
A. Ward, Kevin Rogers, B. Kamin and others
Smith et al v. Driver et al
as 3:2015cv00402
Plaintiff:
Tyree Smith, Marcus Wright, Charles Nelson and others
Defendant:
Demario Driver, F. Estes, M. Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Champaco et al
as 3:2013cv01444
Plaintiff:
Tyree Smith, Marcus Wright, Charles Nelson and others
Defendant:
J. Champaco, T. Perkins, F. Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller et al v. Heyns
as 2:2012cv12371
Plaintiff:
Curtis Fuller, Felicia Dyer, Ursula Heard and others
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns, Patricia Caruso, Sean Lockhart and others
Walker v. Fabish et al
as 3:2011cv01234
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker, Jr.
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Fabish, T. Thompson and J. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Russo et al
as 1:2010cv00948
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker
Defendant:
Joseph D. Russo, William D. Mason and John P. Luskin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
