Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Stafford v. Hamilton County et al
as 1:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Tyler Lee Stafford
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Jim Hammond, QCHC of Tennessee, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Officer's of Metro County Correction's et al
as 3:2021cv00750
Plaintiff:
Scott Allen Martin
Defendant:
Officer's of Metro County Correction's and Officer Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porterfield v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center et al
as 2:2021cv02503
Plaintiff:
Issac Porterfield
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Dr. O. Webb, Dr. Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Fayette County Detention Center et al
as 3:2020cv00760
Plaintiff:
Willie B Wilson
Defendant:
Fayette County Detention Center, J Jacbos, Officer Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yarbrough v. Loudon County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2019cv00278
Defendant:
Loudon County General Sessions Court, Officer Dallas Hilton, Captain Keener and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mark Yarbrough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spradling v. Claiborne County Jail et al
as 3:2019cv00202
Defendant:
Claiborne County Jail, Southern Health Partners, Sgt. Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Glen Spradling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zlatin v. LMDC et al
as 3:2019cv00291
Defendant:
Officer Cadlett, LMDC, Sgt. Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Zlatin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marvin Odom v. Bill Oldham, et al
as 14-6281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN DEMETRIUS ODOM
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL OLDHAM, Shelby County Sheriff, KIM PALMER, LT. WARD and others
Marvin Odom v. Bill Oldham, et al
as 14-6251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN DEMETRIUS ODOM
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL OLDHAM, Shelby County Sheriff, KIM PALMER, CHIEF MOORE and others
Bovan v. Jackson et al
as 5:2014cv00103
Plaintiff:
Eric Bovan
Defendant:
Officer Jackson, Officer Flucka and Wackenhut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
