Cases 1 - 10 of 142
Shockley v. Sweet et al
as 4:2024cv11462
Plaintiff:
Clifton D. Shockley
Defendant:
Sweet, Clemmons, Schirmer and others
Daniel v. Fighter-Daniel et al
as 2:2024cv11218
Plaintiff:
Allen David Daniel
Defendant:
Teri Fighter-Daniel, M. Sorensen, Barber and others
Williams #243786 v. Baker et al
as 1:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Marcus Henry Williams #243786
Defendant:
Dell Baker, M. Truxell, M. Kirky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flakes v. Reed et al
as 2:2024cv10475
Plaintiff:
Jason Flakes
Defendant:
Reed, D. Horvath, J Bugbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flakes #407798 v. Reed et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Jason Flakes #407798
Defendant:
Unknown Reed, D. Horvath, J. Bugbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parsons v. Paige et al
as 5:2024cv10247
Plaintiff:
David Parsons
Defendant:
Paige and Spaulding
Interested Party:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Mallory et al v. Smith et al
as 0:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
James Mallory, Saddiq Al-Rahman Muhhammad and Mrs. Porshia Moneice Mallory
Defendant:
Phillip Smith, John Vaught, Zachary R. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallory et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Mr. James Mallory, Saddiq Al-Rahman Muhhammad and Mrs. Porshia Moneice Mallory
Defendant:
Phillip Smith, John Vaught, Zachary R. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Smith et al
as 0:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Defendant:
Fairrel D. Smith, John D. Vaught, Zachary R. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harrison v. Arnold et al
as 0:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Defendant:
Krystal Arnold, Zachary R. Parsons, P.A. Gregory Hoskins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
